\u00a0 \u00a0 Proceso No. 10460 \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0SALA DE CASACION PENAL \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Magistrado Ponente: \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Dr.DIDIMO PAEZ VELANDIA \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Aprobado Acta No.68-V-18\/95 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Santaf\u00e9 de Bogot\u00e1, D.C., veintidos de \u00a0mayo \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 de \u00a0 mil \u00a0 novecientos \u00a0 noventa \u00a0 y \u00a0cinco. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Se resolver\u00e1 lo\u00a0 que\u00a0 \u00a0en\u00a0 \u00a0derecho \u00a0sea\u00a0 \u00a0procedente\u00a0 sobre la solicitud\u00a0 de\u00a0 \u00a0concesi\u00f3n\u00a0 \u00a0del \u00a0recurso \u00a0extraordinario \u00a0de \u00a0casaci\u00f3n \u00a0interpuesto\u00a0 \u00a0por\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0el\u00a0 \u00a0 se\u00f1or\u00a0 \u00a0 representante\u00a0 \u00a0 de\u00a0 \u00a0 la\u00a0 \u00a0parte\u00a0 civil con\u00a0 \u00a0fundamento\u00a0 \u00a0en\u00a0 \u00a0el \u00a0\u00faltimo \u00a0inciso \u00a0del \u00a0art\u00edculo 218 del C. de P. \u00a0P.,\u00a0 \u00a0contra\u00a0 \u00a0la\u00a0 \u00a0sentencia\u00a0 \u00a0dictada \u00a0el \u00a021 de marzo del \u00a0corriente \u00a0a\u00f1o\u00a0 \u00a0por\u00a0 \u00a0el\u00a0 \u00a0Juzgado\u00a0 \u00a063\u00a0 \u00a0Penal\u00a0 \u00a0del\u00a0 \u00a0Circuito\u00a0 \u00a0de\u00a0 \u00a0Santaf\u00e9\u00a0 \u00a0de \u00a0Bogot\u00e1,\u00a0 en\u00a0 \u00a0la\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0que\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0por\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0revocaci\u00f3n\u00a0\u00a0 de la de primera \u00a0instancia, \u00a0 se \u00a0 absuelve \u00a0al\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0procesado \u00a0 \u00a0RAFAEL\u00a0 \u00a0 ANDRES\u00a0 \u00a0DIAZ\u00a0 \u00a0 ZAMORA \u00a0por \u00a0el \u00a0delito\u00a0 \u00a0de\u00a0 \u00a0lesiones\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 personales\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0culposas\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0ocasionadas\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0en \u00a0accidente\u00a0 \u00a0de\u00a0 \u00a0tr\u00e1nsito\u00a0 \u00a0al\u00a0 \u00a0ciudadano\u00a0 Gonzalo M. \u00a0Parra. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0A \u00a0N \u00a0T \u00a0E \u00a0C \u00a0E \u00a0D \u00a0E \u00a0N \u00a0T \u00a0E \u00a0S \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a01.- El 17 de junio de 1992, hacia \u00a0las \u00a0seis \u00a0y \u00a0media de la tarde del horario adelantado que rigi\u00f3 durante alg\u00fan \u00a0tiempo \u00a0en el pais, cuando el\u00a0 transeunte Gonzalo \u00a0M. \u00a0Parra \u00a0caminaba \u00a0por \u00a0la \u00a0calle 12 de esta ciudad \u00a0capital \u00a0de \u00a0la \u00a0Rep\u00fablica, \u00a0fue \u00a0atropellado \u00a0por \u00a0un \u00a0veh\u00edculo automotor que \u00a0proveniente \u00a0del \u00a0sur \u00a0de \u00a0la ciudad por la carrera 9a. volte\u00f3 hacia el oriente \u00a0por \u00a0la \u00a0mencionada \u00a0calle, \u00a0ocasion\u00e1ndole \u00a0graves lesiones que determinaron su \u00a0incapacidad permante del \u00f3rgano de la locomoci\u00f3n. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Ante la alerta promovida por el \u00a0transeunte \u00a0acompa\u00f1ante \u00a0de \u00a0la \u00a0v\u00edctima \u00a0que \u00a0corri\u00f3 tras el automotor hasta \u00a0lograr \u00a0que \u00a0fuera \u00a0detenido en su marcha algunas cuadras adelante por un agente \u00a0de \u00a0la \u00a0Polic\u00eda, \u00a0fue alcanzado el autom\u00f3vil Dodge de Placas AG-9923 conducido \u00a0por \u00a0el \u00a0ciudadano \u00a0chileno RAFAEL ANDRES DIAZ ZAMORA, \u00a0a \u00a0quien \u00a0se \u00a0sindic\u00f3 \u00a0del \u00a0atropellamiento \u00a0y quien \u00a0permaneci\u00f3 \u00a0 atento \u00a0 al \u00a0 tratamiento \u00a0 m\u00e9dico \u00a0que \u00a0hubo \u00a0de \u00a0prodigarse \u00a0al \u00a0herido. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Tramitado el proceso, el Juzgado \u00a086 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 Penal \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 Municipal \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 profiri\u00f3 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 sentencia \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0condenatoria, que apelada, el Juzgado de \u00a0segunda \u00a0instancia \u00a0antes referido revoc\u00f3\u00a0 \u00a0dando \u00a0aplicaci\u00f3n \u00a0al \u00a0principio \u00a0de \u00a0la favorabilidad por \u00a0duda. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a02.- \u00a0Notificado \u00a0el \u00a0fallo, \u00a0el \u00a0se\u00f1or \u00a0 apoderado \u00a0de \u00a0la \u00a0parte \u00a0civil \u00a0lo\u00a0 \u00a0impugn\u00f3 \u00a0extraordinariamente \u00a0con \u00a0el fundamento legal \u00a0aludido \u00a0y, \u00a0superadas \u00a0las \u00a0incidencias \u00a0que \u00a0provoc\u00f3 el pronunciamiento\u00a0 \u00a0incompetente\u00a0 \u00a0del \u00a0juzgado\u00a0 \u00a0de \u00a0segunda \u00a0instancia \u00a0en \u00a0torno \u00a0a \u00a0la \u00a0concesi\u00f3n \u00a0de \u00a0la \u00a0impugnaci\u00f3n,\u00a0 \u00a0el \u00a0asunto \u00a0fue \u00a0remitido \u00a0a \u00a0la \u00a0Corte \u00a0para\u00a0 lo\u00a0 de\u00a0 su\u00a0 cargo. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0CONSIDERACIONES \u00a0 DE \u00a0 LA \u00a0CORTE \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0La \u00a0 precisi\u00f3n \u00a0 normativa \u00a0reguladora \u00a0del \u00a0recurso \u00a0de \u00a0casaci\u00f3n \u00a0que \u00a0de \u00a0manera \u00a0excepcional \u00a0para \u00a0los \u00a0espec\u00edficos \u00a0casos y por los precisos motivos plasmados en el art\u00edculo 218 del \u00a0C. \u00a0de \u00a0P. \u00a0P. \u00a0compete conceder o negar a la Corte,\u00a0 excusa\u00a0 de\u00a0 \u00a0mayores\u00a0 \u00a0comentarios respecto\u00a0 de\u00a0 la\u00a0 legitimidad\u00a0 de \u00a0la personer\u00eda\u00a0 del\u00a0 recurrente. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Quiso \u00a0el legislador de manera \u00a0expresa \u00a0y \u00a0en \u00a0forma exclusiva, conceder el derecho impugnatorio en comentario, \u00a0al \u00a0Procurador, \u00a0su \u00a0Delegado \u00a0y \u00a0el \u00a0defensor, \u00a0es \u00a0decir, excluy\u00f3 de \u00e9l a la \u00a0representaci\u00f3n \u00a0 de \u00a0 la \u00a0parte \u00a0civil, \u00a0dejando \u00a0la \u00a0posibilidad \u00a0propia \u00a0de \u00a0\u00e9sta \u00a0de \u00a0disentir\u00a0 \u00a0del\u00a0 \u00a0fallo\u00a0 \u00a0absolutorio \u00a0al \u00a0representante \u00a0de la sociedad, el\u00a0 \u00a0Ministerio \u00a0P\u00fablico, \u00a0en \u00a0los \u00a0eventos \u00a0en \u00a0que \u00a0\u00e9ste \u00a0interviene \u00a0y considera \u00a0objetable \u00a0la \u00a0decisi\u00f3n \u00a0en \u00a0tal sentido que pone t\u00e9rmino a las instancias del \u00a0proceso. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0La legitimidad de la personer\u00eda \u00a0del \u00a0 postulante \u00a0 constituye \u00a0 condici\u00f3n \u00a0 de \u00a0 procedibilidad \u00a0 de\u00a0 \u00a0 su \u00a0pretensi\u00f3n\u00a0 \u00a0y hace parte del ordenamiento jur\u00eddico procesal, que como se \u00a0sabe,\u00a0 \u00a0es \u00a0de orden p\u00fablico y de\u00a0 imperativa\u00a0 observancia\u00a0 \u00a0para\u00a0 \u00a0el\u00a0 \u00a0juez, \u00a0por \u00a0antonomasia \u00a0el \u00a0llamado \u00a0a \u00a0respetarlo, \u00a0como \u00a0\u00e1rbitro \u00a0de \u00a0las \u00a0garant\u00edas constitucionales\u00a0 y\u00a0 legales\u00a0 en el \u00a0debate\u00a0 \u00a0sometido \u00a0a\u00a0 su\u00a0 jurisdicci\u00f3n; no puede el funcionario, \u00a0habilitar \u00a0a \u00a0su \u00a0arbitrio \u00a0a \u00a0ninguno \u00a0de los sujetos procesales para ejercitar \u00a0derechos \u00a0que \u00a0la \u00a0ley \u00a0no \u00a0le ha concedido, menos a\u00fan, cuando la preceptiva es \u00a0clara \u00a0 y \u00a0 concreta \u00a0 en \u00a0 sus \u00a0 t\u00e9rminos \u00a0 no \u00a0 dando \u00a0margen \u00a0a \u00a0un \u00a0proceso \u00a0interpretativo\u00a0 que desborde\u00a0 su tenor gramatical. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0En \u00a0el \u00a0caso \u00a0que \u00a0ocupa \u00a0la \u00a0atenci\u00f3n \u00a0de \u00a0la Sala, el profesional que recurre, como se ha indicado, lo hace \u00a0en \u00a0representaci\u00f3n \u00a0de \u00a0la \u00a0parte civil, \u00a0para \u00a0impugnar \u00a0el fallo absolutorio que defrauda los intereses \u00a0de \u00a0su \u00a0poderdante, \u00a0el \u00a0ofendido; \u00a0m\u00e1s es lo cierto, que la misma disposici\u00f3n \u00a0legal \u00a0en que apoya su pedimento, el art\u00edculo 218 del C. de P. P., no contempla \u00a0entre \u00a0los sujetos procesales con opci\u00f3n de recurrir extraordinariamente en los \u00a0excepcionales \u00a0 casos \u00a0de\u00a0 \u00a0que\u00a0 \u00a0ese\u00a0 \u00a0mismo\u00a0 \u00a0precepto \u00a0se \u00a0ocupa,\u00a0 \u00a0a \u00a0la \u00a0parte \u00a0civil, \u00a0raz\u00f3n suficiente\u00a0 para\u00a0 que\u00a0 \u00a0se\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 deniegue\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0la\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 petici\u00f3n,\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 como \u00a0 \u00a0en \u00a0 \u00a0efecto \u00a0 \u00a0se\u00a0 \u00a0har\u00e1. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0En \u00a0m\u00e9rito, \u00a0la \u00a0CORTE \u00a0SUPREMA \u00a0DE \u00a0JUSTICIA en SALA DE CASACION PENAL, \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0R E S U E L V E \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0NO \u00a0 CONCEDER \u00a0el \u00a0recurso \u00a0de \u00a0casaci\u00f3n \u00a0excepcional \u00a0solicitado \u00a0a \u00a0nombre \u00a0de \u00a0la \u00a0parte \u00a0civil en este \u00a0proceso.\u00a0 \u00a0 En \u00a0 firme, \u00a0DEVUELVASE el expediente a la oficina de origen. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0COPIESE, NOTIFIQUESE, CUMPLASE. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
NILSON \u00a0 \u00a0PINILLA \u00a0 PINILLA \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0RICARDO \u00a0 \u00a0 CALVETE \u00a0RANGEL \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
GUILLERMO \u00a0 \u00a0DUQUE \u00a0 \u00a0RUIZ \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0CARLOS \u00a0 \u00a0E. \u00a0 \u00a0MEJIA \u00a0ESCOBAR \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
DIDIMO \u00a0 \u00a0PAEZ \u00a0 \u00a0VELANDIA \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0EDGAR SAAVEDRA ROJAS \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
JUAN \u00a0MANUEL \u00a0TORRES \u00a0FRESNEDA \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0JORGE \u00a0ENRIQUE VALENCIA M. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0CARLOS A.GORDILLO LOMBANA \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 SECRETARIO \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u00a0 \u00a0 Proceso No. 10460 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0SALA DE CASACION PENAL \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Magistrado Ponente: \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-54","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-3"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=54"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=54"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=54"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}