\u00a0 \u00a0 Proceso No 12107 \u00a0<\/p>\n
CORTE \u00a0 SUPREMA \u00a0 DE \u00a0JUSTICIA \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
SALA DE CASACION PENAL \u00a0<\/p>\n
MAGISTRADO PONENTE: \u00a0<\/p>\n
DR. HERMAN GALAN CASTELLANOS \u00a0<\/p>\n
APROBADO ACTA No.017 \u00a0<\/p>\n
Bogot\u00e1, D.C., catorce (14) de febrero de dos \u00a0mil dos (2002). \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
VISTOS \u00a0<\/p>\n
El \u00a0procesado OMAR ENRIQUE HERNANDEZ SHOBTHC, \u00a0coadyuvado \u00a0por \u00a0su \u00a0defensor, \u00a0desiste \u00a0del recurso extraordinario de casaci\u00f3n \u00a0interpuesto \u00a0 contra \u00a0 la \u00a0sentencia \u00a0proferida \u00a0por \u00a0el \u00a0Tribunal \u00a0Superior \u00a0de \u00a0Barranquilla \u00a0el \u00a016 \u00a0de abril de 1996, mediante la cual se confirm\u00f3 la condena \u00a0impuesta \u00a0a \u00a0aqu\u00e9l \u00a0como \u00a0\u00fanico \u00a0inculpado, por el delito de homicidio simple, \u00a0seg\u00fan \u00a0fallo \u00a0de \u00a0primera \u00a0instancia del Juzgado Once Penal del Circuito de esa \u00a0capital. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
CONSIDERACIONES \u00a0DE \u00a0LA \u00a0SALA \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
De acuerdo con el art\u00edculo 230 del C\u00f3digo de \u00a0Procedimiento \u00a0 Penal \u00a0 (ley \u00a0 600 \u00a0 de \u00a02000), \u00a0el \u00a0desistimiento \u00a0del \u00a0recurso \u00a0extraordinario \u00a0de \u00a0casaci\u00f3n \u00a0es posible cuando se formula antes de que la Sala \u00a0adopte la decisi\u00f3n de fondo. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Significa \u00a0lo anterior, que la manifestaci\u00f3n \u00a0de \u00a0desistimiento \u00a0en \u00a0el \u00a0presente asunto es oportuna, puesto que el proceso se \u00a0encuentra \u00a0 para \u00a0 estudio \u00a0 del \u00a0proyecto \u00a0de \u00a0fallo \u00a0registrado \u00a0(fl. \u00a020 \u00a0Cd. \u00a0Cort.). \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
La \u00a0Sala habr\u00e1 de autorizar el desistimiento \u00a0manifestado \u00a0por \u00a0el \u00a0incriminado \u00a0y su defensor (fls. 26 y 35 Cd. Cort.), y por \u00a0provenir \u00a0del \u00a0\u00fanico \u00a0procesado \u00a0y \u00a0recurrente \u00a0en \u00a0casaci\u00f3n, \u00a0las diligencias \u00a0deber\u00e1n ser devueltas a la oficina de origen. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
En m\u00e9rito de lo expuesto, la Corte Suprema de \u00a0Justicia, Sala de Casaci\u00f3n penal. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
RESUELVE \u00a0<\/p>\n
1. \u00a0Aceptar \u00a0el \u00a0desistimiento \u00a0del \u00a0recurso \u00a0extraordinario \u00a0de \u00a0casaci\u00f3n presentado por el procesado OMAR ENRIQUE HERNANDEZ \u00a0SCHOBTHC, \u00a0coadyuvado \u00a0por \u00a0su defensor, conforme a los fundamentos expuestos en \u00a0la parte motiva de esta providencia. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
2. Contra esta providencia procede el recurso \u00a0de reposici\u00f3n. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
3.Devolver \u00a0 el \u00a0 proceso \u00a0al \u00a0Tribunal \u00a0de \u00a0origen. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Notif\u00edquese y c\u00famplase. \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
ALVARO ORLANDO PEREZ PINZON \u00a0<\/p>\n
FERNANDO \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0ARBOLEDA \u00a0RIPOLL\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0JORGE \u00a0 \u00a0E. \u00a0 \u00a0CORDOBA \u00a0POVEDA \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
HERMANGALANCASTELLANOS \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0CARLOS \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0A. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 GALVEZ \u00a0ARGOTE\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
JORGE \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 A. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 GOMEZ \u00a0GALLEGO\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0EDGAR LOMBANA TRUJILLO \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
CARLOS \u00a0 E. \u00a0 MEJIA \u00a0 ESCOBAR \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0NILSON \u00a0 \u00a0E. \u00a0 \u00a0PINILLA \u00a0PINILLA \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0TERESA RUIZ NU\u00d1EZ \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Secretaria \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u00a0 \u00a0 Proceso No 12107 \u00a0 CORTE \u00a0 SUPREMA \u00a0 DE \u00a0JUSTICIA \u00a0\u00a0 SALA DE CASACION PENAL \u00a0 MAGISTRADO PONENTE: \u00a0 DR. HERMAN GALAN CASTELLANOS \u00a0 APROBADO ACTA No.017 \u00a0 Bogot\u00e1, D.C., catorce (14) de febrero de dos \u00a0mil dos (2002). \u00a0\u00a0 VISTOS \u00a0 El \u00a0procesado OMAR ENRIQUE HERNANDEZ SHOBTHC, \u00a0coadyuvado \u00a0por \u00a0su \u00a0defensor, \u00a0desiste […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5372","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-10"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5372","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5372"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5372\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5372"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5372"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5372"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}