\u00a0 \u00a0 Proceso N\u00ba 18023 \u00a0<\/p>\n
CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA \u00a0<\/p>\n
SALA DE CASACION PENAL \u00a0<\/p>\n
MAGISTRADO PONENTE \u00a0<\/p>\n
DR. MAURO SOLARTE PORTILLA \u00a0<\/p>\n
APROBADO ACTA No. 047 \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Bogot\u00e1, \u00a0D.C., \u00a0veintid\u00f3s \u00a0(22) \u00a0de\u00a0 \u00a0marzo \u00a0de \u00a0dos \u00a0mil uno \u00a0(2001). \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
VISTOS \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0La Sala se pronuncia con respecto al impedimento \u00a0manifestado \u00a0por \u00a0los \u00a0doctores \u00a0CARLOS EDUARDO MEJIA ESCOBAR, FERNANDO ARBOLEDA \u00a0RIPOLL, \u00a0JORGE \u00a0CORDOBA POVEDA, CARLOS AUGUSTO GALVEZ ARGOTE, JORGE ANIBAL GOMEZ \u00a0GALLEGO, \u00a0EDGAR\u00a0 \u00a0LOMBANA \u00a0TRUJILLO, \u00a0ALVARO \u00a0ORLANDO PEREZ PINZON y NILSON \u00a0ELIAS \u00a0PINILLA \u00a0PINILLA, \u00a0quienes \u00a0en \u00a0su \u00a0condici\u00f3n de Magistrados\u00a0 de la \u00a0Corporaci\u00f3n \u00a0aducen \u00a0encontrarse \u00a0en \u00a0las \u00a0circunstancias del art\u00edculo 236 del \u00a0C.P.P. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0PARA RESOLVER SE CONSIDERA \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0El \u00a0Tribunal \u00a0Superior \u00a0del \u00a0Distrito \u00a0Judicial \u00a0de Ibagu\u00e9, el 9 de \u00a0noviembre \u00a0de \u00a01995, \u00a0dict\u00f3 \u00a0sentencia \u00a0condenatoria \u00a0contra \u00a0la doctora MARTHA \u00a0CECILIA \u00a0MEDINA \u00a0SOTELO, \u00a0a \u00a0quien \u00a0le \u00a0impuso \u00a0sesenta \u00a0meses de prisi\u00f3n, como \u00a0responsable \u00a0de \u00a0los \u00a0punibles \u00a0de \u00a0falsedad \u00a0material \u00a0de \u00a0empleado \u00a0oficial en \u00a0documento \u00a0p\u00fablico, \u00a0peculado por uso, peculado por apropiaci\u00f3n y falsedad por \u00a0destrucci\u00f3n, \u00a0supresi\u00f3n \u00a0y \u00a0ocultamiento \u00a0de \u00a0documento p\u00fablico, cometidos en \u00a0concurso, \u00a0de \u00a0los \u00a0cuales \u00a0se \u00a0ocuparon \u00a0tres \u00a0causas \u00a0que \u00a0fueron \u00a0acumuladas. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0La \u00a0sentencia \u00a0de primera instancia fue confirmada por la Sala Penal \u00a0de \u00a0la \u00a0Corte \u00a0Suprema \u00a0de Justicia, en providencia del 14 de agosto de 2000, al \u00a0desatar \u00a0el \u00a0recurso \u00a0de \u00a0apelaci\u00f3n interpuesto por el Ministerio P\u00fablico y el \u00a0defensor. \u00a0Unicamente \u00a0se modific\u00f3\u00a0 la pena de interdicci\u00f3n de derechos y \u00a0funciones \u00a0p\u00fablicas \u00a0para \u00a0fijarla \u00a0en \u00a0un \u00a0t\u00e9rmino igual a la pena principal. \u00a0Intervinieron \u00a0en \u00a0esa \u00a0decisi\u00f3n \u00a0como \u00a0Magistrados los doctores CARLOS EDUARDO \u00a0MEJIA \u00a0ESCOBAR, \u00a0FERNANDO \u00a0ARBOLEDA RIPOLL, JORGE CORDOBA POVEDA, CARLOS AUGUSTO \u00a0GALVEZ \u00a0ARGOTE, JORGE ANIBAL GOMEZ GALLEGO, EDGAR\u00a0 LOMBANA TRUJILLO, ALVARO \u00a0ORLANDO PEREZ PINZON y NILSON ELIAS PINILLA PINILLA. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0En \u00a0esta \u00a0oportunidad, \u00a0MARTHA \u00a0CECILIA \u00a0MEDINA \u00a0SOTELO, \u00a0a trav\u00e9s de apoderado, interpone acci\u00f3n de revisi\u00f3n \u00a0contra \u00a0la \u00a0sentencia \u00a0condenatoria \u00a0proferida \u00a0en \u00a0su \u00a0contra, \u00a0conforme \u00a0a las \u00a0referencias \u00a0hechas \u00a0en \u00a0los p\u00e1rrafos anteriores, con base en la causal segunda \u00a0prevista\u00a0 \u00a0 en \u00a0el \u00a0numeral\u00a0 \u00a02 \u00a0del \u00a0art\u00edculo \u00a0232 \u00a0del \u00a0C\u00f3digo \u00a0de \u00a0Procedimiento Penal. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Establece el \u00a0art. \u00a0236 \u00a0del \u00a0C.P.P. \u00a0como \u00a0causal \u00a0de \u00a0impedimento de car\u00e1cter especial para \u00a0conocer \u00a0 del \u00a0tr\u00e1mite \u00a0de \u00a0la \u00a0revisi\u00f3n \u00a0a \u00a0quienes \u00a0hubieren \u00a0suscrito \u00a0como \u00a0magistrados \u00a0la decisi\u00f3n objeto de revisi\u00f3n, situaci\u00f3n debidamente acreditada \u00a0en \u00a0el sub \u2013 judice para con \u00a0los \u00a0Honorables \u00a0Magistrados \u00a0que se han declarado impedidos, por lo que resulta \u00a0procedente \u00a0aceptar \u00a0el \u00a0impedimento \u00a0manifestado \u00a0por \u00a0ellos, separ\u00e1ndolos del \u00a0conocimiento del presente asunto. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0En \u00a0m\u00e9rito \u00a0de \u00a0lo \u00a0expuesto, la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de \u00a0Casaci\u00f3n \u00a0Penal, \u00a0administrando \u00a0justicia \u00a0en \u00a0nombre \u00a0de \u00a0la \u00a0Rep\u00fablica y por \u00a0autoridad de la ley, \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0RESUELVE: \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Aceptar el \u00a0impedimento \u00a0manifestado \u00a0por \u00a0los \u00a0Magistrados \u00a0doctores \u00a0CARLOS \u00a0EDUARDO MEJIA \u00a0ESCOBAR, \u00a0FERNANDO \u00a0ARBOLEDA RIPOLL, JORGE CORDOBA POVEDA, CARLOS AUGUSTO GALVEZ \u00a0ARGOTE, \u00a0JORGE \u00a0ANIBAL \u00a0GOMEZ \u00a0GALLEGO, \u00a0EDGAR\u00a0 \u00a0LOMBANA \u00a0TRUJILLO, \u00a0ALVARO \u00a0ORLANDO \u00a0PEREZ \u00a0PINZON \u00a0y \u00a0NILSON \u00a0ELIAS \u00a0PINILLA \u00a0PINILLA, \u00a0y \u00a0en \u00a0consecuencia \u00a0separarlos \u00a0del \u00a0conocimiento del presente asunto, conforme a los expuesto en la \u00a0parte motiva de esta providencia. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Comun\u00edquese y c\u00famplase. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
MAURO \u00a0 \u00a0SOLARTE \u00a0PORTILLA \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
JAIME \u00a0 CAMACHO \u00a0 FLOREZ \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0MANUEL A. CORREDOR PARDO \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Conjuez \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Conjuez \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
ALVARO \u00a0NICOLAS \u00a0CORREAL REYES \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0ALFONSO \u00a0 \u00a0 PINILLA \u00a0CONTRERAS \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Conjuez \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Conjuez \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
PEDRO \u00a0 PULIDO \u00a0 GUTIERREZ \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0YESID REYES ALVARADO \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Conjuez \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Conjuez \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
JOSE \u00a0IGNACIO \u00a0TALERO \u00a0LOZADA \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0EDUARDO \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0TORRES \u00a0ESCALLON \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Conjuez \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Conjuez \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
TERESA RUIZ NU\u00d1EZ \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Secretaria \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u00a0 \u00a0 Proceso N\u00ba 18023 \u00a0 CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA \u00a0 SALA DE CASACION PENAL \u00a0 MAGISTRADO PONENTE \u00a0 DR. MAURO SOLARTE PORTILLA \u00a0 APROBADO ACTA No. 047 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4838","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-9"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4838","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4838"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4838\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4838"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4838"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4838"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}