\u00a0 \u00a0 Proceso \u00a0No. \u00a09949 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0SALA DE CASACION PENAL \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Aprobado acta No.29 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Magistrado Ponente: \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Dr. GUILLERMO DUQUE RUIZ \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Santa Fe de Bogot\u00e1, D. C., primero de marzo \u00a0de mil novecientos noventa y cinco. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Resuelve la \u00a0Sala \u00a0el \u00a0recurso \u00a0de \u00a0reposici\u00f3n \u00a0interpuesto \u00a0contra \u00a0el \u00a0auto de 31 de enero \u00a0\u00faltimo, \u00a0mediante \u00a0el cual se orden\u00f3 tramitar conjuntamente las solicitudes de \u00a0extradici\u00f3n \u00a0 del \u00a0 ciudadano \u00a0 MARCO \u00a0ANTONIO \u00a0ROCA \u00a0ALI, \u00a0presentadas \u00a0por \u00a0las \u00a0Embajadas de los Estados \u00a0Unidos de Am\u00e9rica y la Rep\u00fablica de Bolivia. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Fundamentaci\u00f3n \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 del \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 recurso.- \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Dos razones \u00a0plantea \u00a0el \u00a0defensor \u00a0del \u00a0requerido \u00a0para \u00a0solicitar \u00a0que \u00a0la \u00a0Sala revoque el \u00a0prove\u00eddo \u00a0impugnado \u00a0y \u00a0reasuma \u00a0al \u00a0conocimiento \u00a0de \u00a0las solicitudes en forma \u00a0separada: \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a01.- Que la \u00a0persona \u00a0requerida \u00a0por \u00a0el \u00a0Gobierno de los Estados Unidos de Am\u00e9rica no es la \u00a0misma \u00a0 que \u00a0se \u00a0encuentra \u00a0detenida, \u00a0y \u00a0que, \u00a0en \u00a0cambio, \u00a0dicha \u00a0persona \u00a0s\u00ed \u00a0corresponde a la que es pedida por el Gobierno de Bolivia. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a02.- Que en \u00a0materia \u00a0 de \u00a0extradici\u00f3n, \u00a0las \u00a0normas \u00a0del \u00a0C\u00f3digo \u00a0de \u00a0Procedimiento \u00a0Penal \u00a0colombiano \u00a0solamente tienen aplicabilidad cuando no existen tratados p\u00fablicos, \u00a0lo \u00a0cual \u00a0puede \u00a0afirmarse \u00a0de \u00a0Estados Unidos y Colombia, pero no de Colombia y \u00a0Bolivia, \u00a0ya \u00a0que \u00a0entre \u00a0estos \u00a0Estados \u00a0existe \u00a0el \u00a0Convenio \u00a0de \u00a01911, que se \u00a0encuentra vigente y que es de imperioso cumplimiento. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0SE \u00a0CONSIDERA: \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0A la primera \u00a0raz\u00f3n \u00a0tra\u00edda \u00a0por \u00a0el defensor de Marco Antonio Su\u00e1rez basta responder, para \u00a0desestimarla, \u00a0que \u00a0la deficiente o defectuosa identidad de la persona requerida \u00a0no \u00a0es \u00a0motivo \u00a0para \u00a0que \u00a0la \u00a0Corte \u00a0se \u00a0abstenga \u00a0de \u00a0tramitar la solicitud de \u00a0extradici\u00f3n. \u00a0La \u00a0no \u00a0demostraci\u00f3n \u00a0plena \u00a0de \u00a0la identidad del solicitado por \u00a0parte \u00a0de \u00a0Estado \u00a0requirente, \u00a0conduce, \u00a0cuando \u00a0dicha deficiencia realmente se \u00a0presenta, \u00a0a \u00a0que \u00a0la Corte emita concepto negativo a la petici\u00f3n (art. 558 del \u00a0C. \u00a0de \u00a0P. \u00a0P.), \u00a0pero \u00a0no, \u00a0como \u00a0lo pretende el impugnante, a que se niegue su \u00a0tr\u00e1mite. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Sobre la \u00a0existencia \u00a0de \u00a0un \u00a0Convenio \u00a0de \u00a0extradici\u00f3n \u00a0entre \u00a0los Estados de Colombia y \u00a0Bolivia, \u00a0argumento \u00a0que \u00a0el \u00a0defensor \u00a0trae \u00a0para \u00a0insinuar \u00a0que las normas del \u00a0C\u00f3digo \u00a0de \u00a0Procedimiento \u00a0Penal \u00a0Colombiano \u00a0no \u00a0son aplicables a la solicitud \u00a0boliviana, \u00a0d\u00edgase \u00a0que \u00a0la \u00a0Sala \u00a0en \u00a0ning\u00fan \u00a0momento \u00a0neg\u00f3 o desconoci\u00f3 la \u00a0existencia \u00a0de \u00a0dicho \u00a0Tratado. Por el contrario, hizo expresa referencia a \u00e9l, \u00a0como \u00a0tambi\u00e9n a otros Convenios, precisamente para asegurar que, de acuerdo con \u00a0ellos, \u00a0era \u00a0el derecho interno de la parte requerida el que deb\u00eda aplicarse en \u00a0esos \u00a0 casos. \u00a0 Hasta \u00a0cit\u00f3 \u00a0la \u00a0norma \u00a0correspondiente \u00a0del \u00a0Convenio \u00a0que \u00a0el \u00a0memorialista menciona. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Para mayor \u00a0ilustraci\u00f3n, \u00a0 se \u00a0 transcribe \u00a0 en \u00a0 seguida \u00a0la \u00a0parte \u00a0respectiva \u00a0del \u00a0auto \u00a0impugnado: \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0“La \u00a0solicitud \u00a0que \u00a0ahora \u00a0se presenta por parte de la Embajada de Bolivia, respecto \u00a0de \u00a0la \u00a0misma \u00a0persona, \u00a0debe \u00a0tambi\u00e9n \u00a0sujetarse \u00a0en \u00a0su tr\u00e1mite a las normas \u00a0pertinentes \u00a0del \u00a0C\u00f3digo \u00a0de \u00a0Procedimiento Penal Colombiano, pues los Acuerdos \u00a0`Sobre \u00a0Extradici\u00f3n \u00a0de \u00a01911, \u00a0firmado \u00a0en Caracas, La Convenci\u00f3n Unica Sobre \u00a0Estupefacientes \u00a0enmendada \u00a0por \u00a0El Protocolo de Modificaci\u00f3n de la Convenci\u00f3n \u00a0Unica \u00a0de \u00a01961, \u00a0y \u00a0La \u00a0Convenci\u00f3n \u00a0de \u00a0las Naciones Unidas Contra el Tr\u00e1fico \u00a0Il\u00edcito \u00a0de \u00a0Estupefacientes \u00a0y Sustancias Sicotr\u00f3picas firmada en Viena el 20 \u00a0de \u00a0diciembre \u00a0de \u00a01988, \u00a0que fueron ratificados previa aprobaci\u00f3n mediante las \u00a0leyes \u00a026 \u00a0de 1913, 13 de 1974 y 67 de 1993′, aplicables al caso seg\u00fan concepto \u00a0del \u00a0Ministerio \u00a0de \u00a0Relaciones \u00a0Exteriores (fls.34 del anexo), prev\u00e9n que toda \u00a0petici\u00f3n \u00a0de \u00a0extradici\u00f3n \u00a0debe \u00a0sujetarse \u00a0al \u00a0derecho \u00a0interno \u00a0de \u00a0la parte \u00a0requerida \u00a0(arts.8\u00ba \u00a0ley 26 de 1913 y art.7\u00ba.12 de la ley 67 de 1993”. (fls.24 \u00a0y 25 del Cuaderno de la Corte) \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0El art\u00edculo \u00a08\u00ba \u00a0de \u00a0la \u00a0ley \u00a026 \u00a0de \u00a01913 \u00a0(aprobatoria \u00a0del \u00a0Convenio \u00a0a que se refiere el \u00a0impugnante) dice en lo pertinente: \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0“La \u00a0extradici\u00f3n \u00a0de \u00a0los \u00a0pr\u00f3fugos \u00a0en \u00a0virtud \u00a0de \u00a0las \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0estipulaciones \u00a0 del \u00a0 presente \u00a0 Tratado \u00a0 se \u00a0verificar\u00e1 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0de \u00a0conformidad \u00a0con \u00a0las \u00a0leyes \u00a0de \u00a0extradici\u00f3n \u00a0del \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Estado \u00a0 \u00a0 al \u00a0 \u00a0 cual \u00a0 \u00a0 se \u00a0 \u00a0haga \u00a0 \u00a0la \u00a0demanda”. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Y \u00a0el \u00a0art\u00edculo \u00a05\u00ba \u00a0de \u00a0la \u00a0ley aprobatoria de la Convenci\u00f3n de las Naciones Unidas \u00a0Contra \u00a0el \u00a0Tr\u00e1fico \u00a0Il\u00edcito de Estupefacientes y Sustancias Sicotr\u00f3picas (67 \u00a0de 1993), establece: \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0“La \u00a0extradici\u00f3n \u00a0estar\u00e1 \u00a0sujeta \u00a0a \u00a0las \u00a0condiciones \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0previstas \u00a0por \u00a0la \u00a0legislaci\u00f3n \u00a0de \u00a0la parte \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0requerida \u00a0o \u00a0por \u00a0los \u00a0tratados \u00a0de extradici\u00f3n \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0aplicables, inclu\u00eddos los motivos por los que \u00a0la \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0parte \u00a0requerida puede denegar la extradici\u00f3n”. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0De manera \u00a0que \u00a0ninguna \u00a0duda \u00a0queda \u00a0sobre \u00a0la \u00a0aplicabilidad de las normas del C\u00f3digo de \u00a0Procedimiento Penal Colombiano a la solicitud boliviana. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Por no ser \u00a0atendibles, \u00a0entonces, \u00a0las \u00a0razones presentadas por el impugnante, la decisi\u00f3n \u00a0cuestionada no sufrir\u00e1 modificaci\u00f3n alguna. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0En m\u00e9rito \u00a0de \u00a0lo \u00a0expuesto, \u00a0LA \u00a0CORTE \u00a0SUPREMA \u00a0DE \u00a0JUSTICIA, \u00a0SALA \u00a0DE \u00a0CASACION \u00a0PENAL, \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0R E S U E \u00a0L V E: \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0NO REPONER \u00a0la providencia impugnada. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Notif\u00edquese y c\u00famplase. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
NILSON \u00a0 \u00a0PINILLA \u00a0 PINILLA \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0RICARDO CALVETE RANGEL \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
GUILLERMO \u00a0 \u00a0DUQUE \u00a0 \u00a0RUIZ \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0CARLOS E. MEJIA ESCOBAR \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
DIDIMO \u00a0 \u00a0PAEZ \u00a0 \u00a0VELANDIA \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0EDGAR SAAVEDRA ROJAS \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
JUAN \u00a0MANUEL \u00a0TORRES \u00a0FRESNEDA \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0JORGE ENRIQUE VALENCIA M. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Carlos \u00a0 Alberto \u00a0 Gordillo \u00a0L. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 SECRETARIO \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u00a0 \u00a0 Proceso \u00a0No. \u00a09949 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0SALA DE CASACION PENAL \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Aprobado acta No.29 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-258","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-3"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/258","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=258"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/258\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=258"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=258"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=258"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}