\u00a0 \u00a0 CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA \u00a0<\/p>\n
SALA DE CASACI\u00d3N PENAL \u00a0<\/p>\n
Magistrado Ponente: \u00a0<\/p>\n
GUSTAVO ENRIQUE MALO FERN\u00c1NDEZ \u00a0<\/p>\n
Aprobado \u00a0Acta N\u00b0 \u00a0445. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Bogot\u00e1, \u00a0D.C., \u00a0cinco de diciembre de dos mil doce. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
V \u00a0I \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0S \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0T \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0O \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0S \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Decide \u00a0la \u00a0Corte \u00a0sobre \u00a0el \u00a0impedimento \u00a0expresado \u00a0por \u00a0varios de los \u00a0Magistrados \u00a0de \u00a0la \u00a0Sala, \u00a0quienes \u00a0en \u00a0virtud \u00a0del \u00a0presente \u00a0 asunto \u00a0 invocan \u00a0la \u00a0causal \u00a0prevista \u00a0en \u00a0los \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 art\u00edculos \u00a056 \u00a0 \u00a0\u2013numeral \u00a0 6\u00b0- \u00a0 y \u00a0 197 \u00a0 de \u00a0 la \u00a0Ley \u00a0906 \u00a0de \u00a02004. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
A \u00a0N \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0T \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0E \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0C \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0E \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0D \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0E \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0N \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0T \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0E \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0S \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
El 7 \u00a0 \u00a0de \u00a0 agosto \u00a0 del \u00a0 a\u00f1o \u00a0en curso, la \u00a0apoderada \u00a0de LUIS \u00a0 CIRO \u00a0 G\u00d3MEZ \u00a0VEGA, \u00a0quien \u00a0fue \u00a0condenado \u00a0 por \u00a0 los \u00a0 delitos \u00a0 de \u00a0 fraude \u00a0 \u00a0procesal \u00a0 \u00a0y \u00a0 uso \u00a0 \u00a0 de \u00a0 \u00a0 documento \u00a0 \u00a0 p\u00fablico \u00a0falso, \u00a0present\u00f3 \u00a0demanda \u00a0con \u00a0 \u00a0el \u00a0 \u00a0fin \u00a0 \u00a0de \u00a0 \u00a0promover \u00a0 \u00a0acci\u00f3n \u00a0 \u00a0de \u00a0revisi\u00f3n \u00a0en contra \u00a0de las \u00a0decisiones \u00a0 que \u00a0 pusieron \u00a0 fin \u00a0 al \u00a0proceso \u00a0 adelantado \u00a0 en \u00a0 contra \u00a0de \u00a0aqu\u00e9l, \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 a \u00a0saber: \u00a0sentencias \u00a0de \u00a0(i) \u00a0 primera \u00a0instancia, \u00a0dictada \u00a0por \u00a0el Juzgado Penal del Circuito de El \u00a0L\u00edbano \u00a0(Tolima) el 2 de mayo de 2008; (ii) \u00a0segundo \u00a0grado, proferida por la \u00a0Sala \u00a0 \u00a0Penal \u00a0 \u00a0del \u00a0 \u00a0Tribunal \u00a0 \u00a0Superior \u00a0 \u00a0de \u00a0Ibagu\u00e9 \u00a0 (Tolima) \u00a0el \u00a010 \u00a0de \u00a0marzo \u00a0de \u00a02011, \u00a0y \u00a0(iii) \u00a0casaci\u00f3n, \u00a0emitida \u00a0por \u00a0esta \u00a0Corte \u00a0el 15 febrero de 2012. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
El \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00faltimo \u00a0 \u00a0de \u00a0 \u00a0los \u00a0 \u00a0pronunciamientos \u00a0 tra\u00eddo \u00a0 \u00a0a \u00a0 \u00a0colaci\u00f3n, \u00a0 fue \u00a0firmado \u00a0por \u00a0los \u00a0nueve \u00a0Magistrados \u00a0que integraban la Sala \u00a0de Casaci\u00f3n Penal \u00a0de la Corte Suprema de Justicia \u00a0para ese momento. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Siete de ellos, \u00a0los \u00a0 doctores \u00a0 JOS\u00c9 \u00a0LEONIDAS \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0BUSTOS \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 MART\u00cdNEZ, \u00a0JOS\u00c9 \u00a0LUIS \u00a0 BARCEL\u00d3 \u00a0CAMACHO, \u00a0FERNANDO \u00a0ALBERTO \u00a0CASTRO \u00a0CABALLERO, \u00a0 MAR\u00cdA \u00a0DEL \u00a0ROSARIO \u00a0GONZ\u00c1LEZ MU\u00d1OZ, \u00a0LUIS \u00a0 GUILLERMO \u00a0 SALAZAR \u00a0 OTERO, \u00a0 JULIO \u00a0ENRIQUE \u00a0SOCHA \u00a0SALAMANCA \u00a0y \u00a0JAVIER \u00a0DE \u00a0JES\u00daS \u00a0 \u00a0 ZAPATA \u00a0 \u00a0 ORT\u00cdZ, \u00a0 \u00a0en \u00a0manifestaci\u00f3n \u00a0 \u00a0efectuada \u00a0 \u00a0el \u00a0 10 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 de \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0septiembre \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 de \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a02012, \u00a0 se \u00a0 declararon \u00a0 impedidos \u00a0para \u00a0conocer \u00a0 del \u00a0 presente \u00a0 asunto, \u00a0 apoyados \u00a0 en \u00a0las \u00a0art\u00edculos \u00a056-6 \u00a0y \u00a0197 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 del \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 C\u00f3digo \u00a0 de \u00a0 Procedimiento \u00a0 Penal \u00a0de \u00a02004, \u00a0 \u00a0esto \u00a0 \u00a0es, \u00a0 por \u00a0 haber \u00a0 suscrito \u00a0 la \u00a0decisi\u00f3n \u00a0 \u00a0objeto \u00a0 de \u00a0 la \u00a0 acci\u00f3n de revisi\u00f3n. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
En \u00a0 consecuencia, \u00a0 se \u00a0nombraron \u00a0como \u00a0Conjueces, \u00a0en \u00a0reemplazo \u00a0de \u00a0los \u00a0Magistrados \u00a0que \u00a0expresaron \u00a0 su \u00a0 impedimento, \u00a0 los \u00a0doctores \u00a0LUIS \u00a0BERNARDO \u00a0 \u00a0 ALZATE \u00a0 \u00a0G\u00d3MEZ, \u00a0 \u00a0PAULA \u00a0 \u00a0CADAVID \u00a0LONDO\u00d1O, DIEGO EUGENIO CORREDOR BELTR\u00c1N, \u00a0 \u00a0 RAMIRO \u00a0 \u00a0 ALONSO \u00a0 \u00a0 MAR\u00cdN \u00a0V\u00c1SQUEZ, \u00a0 \u00a0 RICARDO \u00a0 \u00a0POSADA \u00a0 \u00a0MAYA, \u00a0 \u00a0JULIO \u00a0ANDR\u00c9S \u00a0 \u00a0SAMPEDRO \u00a0 ARRUBLA \u00a0 y \u00a0 LUIS \u00a0 GONZALO \u00a0VEL\u00c1SQUEZ \u00a0 POSADA, \u00a0quienes tomaron posesi\u00f3n \u00a0de su cargo. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Posteriormente, \u00a0el \u00a0asunto fue asignado a \u00a0este despacho. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
CONSIDERACIONES DE LA CORTE \u00a0<\/p>\n
De entrada se evidencia que los Magistrados \u00a0que \u00a0 han \u00a0 manifestado \u00a0su \u00a0impedimento \u00a0conjunto \u00a0para \u00a0conocer \u00a0del \u00a0presente \u00a0asunto, el 15 \u00a0de febrero \u00a0de \u00a0 2012 \u00a0suscribieron \u00a0la \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 sentencia \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0mediante \u00a0la \u00a0cual \u00a0se decidi\u00f3 no casar \u00a0el \u00a0 fallo \u00a0condenatorio \u00a0proferido \u00a0en \u00a0contra \u00a0de \u00a0LUIS \u00a0CIRO \u00a0G\u00d3MEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 CABEZAS, \u00a0por \u00a0las \u00a0conductas \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0punibles \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0de \u00a0 \u00a0 fraude \u00a0 \u00a0procesal \u00a0 y \u00a0 uso \u00a0 \u00a0 de \u00a0 \u00a0 documento \u00a0 \u00a0p\u00fablico \u00a0falso. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Aduciendo que en \u00a0este \u00a0 caso \u00a0 oper\u00f3 \u00a0 la \u00a0prescripci\u00f3n \u00a0de \u00a0la \u00a0acci\u00f3n penal desde la etapa \u00a0instructiva, \u00a0 \u00a0 la \u00a0 \u00a0 defensora \u00a0 \u00a0 de \u00a0 \u00a0G\u00d3MEZ \u00a0CABEZAS incoa la presente \u00a0acci\u00f3n \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0de \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 revisi\u00f3n \u00a0con \u00a0fundamento en la \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 causal \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0segunda \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0del \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0art\u00edculo \u00a0 220 \u00a0 de \u00a0 la \u00a0 Ley \u00a0600 \u00a0de \u00a02000, \u00a0 \u00a0es \u00a0 \u00a0decir \u00a0\u201ccuando \u00a0 \u00a0 se \u00a0hubiere dictado sentencia \u00a0condenatoria \u00a0o \u00a0que imponga medida de seguridad, \u00a0en \u00a0 proceso \u00a0 que \u00a0 no \u00a0 pod\u00eda \u00a0 iniciarse \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0o \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0proseguirse \u00a0 \u00a0 por \u00a0prescripci\u00f3n \u00a0 de \u00a0la \u00a0acci\u00f3n, \u00a0por \u00a0falta \u00a0de \u00a0querella \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0o \u00a0petici\u00f3n v\u00e1lidamente formulada, o por cualquier otra \u00a0causal \u00a0de \u00a0extinci\u00f3n de \u00a0la \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 acci\u00f3n \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 penal\u201d. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
As\u00ed las cosas, \u00a0como \u00a0 est\u00e1 \u00a0 claro \u00a0 que \u00a0 la \u00a0acci\u00f3n \u00a0se \u00a0dirige \u00a0en \u00a0contra del prove\u00eddo \u00a0por \u00a0medio \u00a0del \u00a0cual \u00a0la \u00a0Corte no cas\u00f3 \u00a0 la \u00a0 sentencia \u00a0 impugnada \u00a0 extraordinariamente, \u00a0se \u00a0configura \u00a0la \u00a0causal \u00a0de \u00a0impedimento especial prevista en el \u00a0art\u00edculo \u00a0 228 \u00a0 de \u00a0 la \u00a0 citada \u00a0 normatividad, \u00a0acorde \u00a0con la \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 cual \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u201cno \u00a0podr\u00e1 \u00a0intervenir \u00a0en \u00a0el \u00a0tr\u00e1mite \u00a0y decisi\u00f3n \u00a0de \u00a0esta \u00a0acci\u00f3n ning\u00fan \u00a0 magistrado \u00a0 que \u00a0 haya \u00a0 suscrito \u00a0 la \u00a0 decisi\u00f3n objeto de la misma\u201d. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Lo \u00a0anterior, como reiteraci\u00f3n \u00a0 \u00a0de \u00a0 lo \u00a0 consagrado \u00a0 como \u00a0 causal \u00a0 general \u00a0 de \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0impedimento \u00a0 \u00a0en \u00a0 \u00a0el \u00a0 \u00a0numeral \u00a0 \u00a0 6\u00b0 \u00a0 \u00a0 del \u00a0 \u00a0 art\u00edculo \u00a0 \u00a099 \u00a0 del \u00a0 C\u00f3digo de \u00a0Procedimiento \u00a0Penal \u00a0de \u00a02000, \u00a0el \u00a0cual \u00a0prev\u00e9 \u00a0que \u00a0la \u00a0misma se configura \u00a0\u201ccuando el funcionario haya dictado la providencia \u00a0cuya \u00a0 revisi\u00f3n \u00a0 se \u00a0trata\u201d. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
En \u00a0este caso, no sobra anotar, se aplican \u00a0las \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 normas \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0respectivas \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0de \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0la \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0codificaci\u00f3n procesal penal de 2000, por \u00a0ser \u00a0la \u00a0que \u00a0rigi\u00f3 el presente asunto, si bien los \u00a0preceptos \u00a0invocados \u00a0al manifestarse la causal impeditiva, fueron reiterados en \u00a0las normas que se citan de la Ley 906 de 2004. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Lo \u00a0 \u00a0anterior \u00a0 significa \u00a0 que \u00a0 le \u00a0asiste \u00a0raz\u00f3n \u00a0 a \u00a0los \u00a0Magistrados \u00a0que \u00a0han \u00a0exteriorizado \u00a0su impedimento para conocer de la presente \u00a0acci\u00f3n \u00a0de \u00a0revisi\u00f3n, \u00a0situaci\u00f3n \u00a0que, \u00a0por \u00a0lo \u00a0tanto, \u00a0impone aceptar la \u00a0declaraci\u00f3n \u00a0conjunta \u00a0que \u00a0en \u00a0tal \u00a0sentido \u00a0 \u00a0 han \u00a0 \u00a0 emitido, \u00a0 \u00a0 con \u00a0 \u00a0 base \u00a0 \u00a0 en \u00a0 \u00a0los \u00a0citados \u00a0preceptos. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
En \u00a0m\u00e9rito \u00a0de lo expuesto, la \u00a0Corte \u00a0Suprema de Justicia, Sala de \u00a0Casaci\u00f3n Penal, \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
R \u00a0E \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 S \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 U \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 E \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 L \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 V \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 E \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
ACEPTAR \u00a0el \u00a0impedimento \u00a0 que \u00a0 conjuntamente \u00a0 han \u00a0expresado \u00a0los \u00a0Magistrados \u00a0 JOS\u00c9 \u00a0LEONIDAS \u00a0BUSTOS \u00a0MART\u00cdNEZ, \u00a0JOS\u00c9 \u00a0LUIS \u00a0BARCEL\u00d3 \u00a0CAMACHO, \u00a0FERNANDO \u00a0ALBERTO \u00a0CASTRO CABALLERO, MAR\u00cdA DEL \u00a0ROSARIO \u00a0GONZ\u00c1LEZ \u00a0MU\u00d1OZ, \u00a0LUIS \u00a0GUILLERMO \u00a0SALAZAR OTERO, JULIO ENRIQUE SOCHA \u00a0SALAMANCA \u00a0y \u00a0JAVIER \u00a0DE \u00a0JES\u00daS \u00a0ZAPATA \u00a0ORT\u00cdZ, \u00a0a \u00a0quienes, \u00a0en consecuencia, se les separa del conocimiento del asunto. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Comun\u00edquese y c\u00famplase. \u00a0<\/p>\n
GUSTAVO ENRIQUE MALO FERN\u00c1NDEZ \u00a0<\/p>\n
LUIS \u00a0BERNARDO \u00a0ALZATE \u00a0G\u00d3MEZ \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0PAULA CADAVID LONDO\u00d1O \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Conjuez \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Conjuez \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
DIEGO EUGENIO CORREDOR BELTR\u00c1N \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 RAMIRO ALONSO MAR\u00cdN V\u00c1SQUEZ \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Conjuez \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Conjuez \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
RICARDO \u00a0 \u00a0POSADA \u00a0 \u00a0MAYA \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0JULIO ANDR\u00c9S SAMPEDRO ARRUBLA \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Conjuez \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Conjuez \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
LUIS GONZALO VEL\u00c1SQUEZ POSADA \u00a0<\/p>\n
Conjuez \u00a0<\/p>\n
NUBIA YOLANDA NOVA GARC\u00cdA \u00a0<\/p>\n
Secretaria \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u00a0 \u00a0 CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA \u00a0 SALA DE CASACI\u00d3N PENAL \u00a0 Magistrado Ponente: \u00a0 GUSTAVO ENRIQUE MALO FERN\u00c1NDEZ \u00a0 Aprobado \u00a0Acta N\u00b0 \u00a0445. \u00a0\u00a0 Bogot\u00e1, \u00a0D.C., \u00a0cinco de diciembre de dos mil doce. \u00a0\u00a0 V \u00a0I \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0S \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0T \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25067","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-20"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25067","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25067"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25067\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25067"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25067"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25067"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}