\u00a0 \u00a0 Proceso No 29523 \u00a0<\/p>\n
CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA \u00a0<\/p>\n
SALA DE CASACI\u00d3N PENAL \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Magistrado ponente \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0JAVIER ZAPATA ORTIZ \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Aprobada\u00a0 Acta No. 105 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Bogot\u00e1 D. C., treinta\u00a0 (30) de abril de dos mil ocho (2008) \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Los \u00a0 suscritos \u00a0 colegiados \u00a0 de \u00a0 la \u00a0 Sala \u00a0de \u00a0Casaci\u00f3n \u00a0Penal \u00a0manifestamos \u00a0conjuntamente \u00a0nuestro \u00a0impedimento para intervenir en la presente \u00a0acci\u00f3n \u00a0 de \u00a0 revisi\u00f3n, \u00a0 que \u00a0correspondi\u00f3 \u00a0por \u00a0sorteo \u00a0reparto \u00a0al \u00a0Despacho \u00a0del \u00a0H. \u00a0magistrado \u00a0Dr. \u00a0JAVIER ZAPATA ORTIZ, por las siguientes razones: \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
1. \u00a0Mediante \u00a0sentencia \u00a0del \u00a025 \u00a0de \u00a0 julio \u00a0de \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 2003, \u00a0 \u00a0el \u00a0Juzgado \u00a0Cuarenta \u00a0y \u00a0Dos \u00a0Penal \u00a0 del \u00a0 Circuito \u00a0 de \u00a0 Bogot\u00e1, \u00a0 conden\u00f3 \u00a0a \u00a0FABIOLA \u00a0GARCIA RUIZ,\u00a0 \u00a0a \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 la \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 pena \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 principal \u00a0de \u00a0nueve \u00a0 (9) \u00a0 a\u00f1os \u00a0 y \u00a0seis \u00a0 \u00a0(6) \u00a0meses \u00a0de \u00a0prisi\u00f3n, \u00a0 \u00a0 multa \u00a0 \u00a0 de \u00a0 \u00a0$32.000.000,oo\u00a0 \u00a0e\u00a0 inhabilitaci\u00f3n para el ejercicio de derechos \u00a0y \u00a0funciones \u00a0p\u00fablicas \u00a0por \u00a0el mismo t\u00e9rmino de la \u00a0privaci\u00f3n \u00a0 de \u00a0 la \u00a0 libertad, \u00a0 a \u00a0indemnizar \u00a0los \u00a0perjuicios \u00a0 generados \u00a0 con \u00a0 la \u00a0 infracci\u00f3n; \u00a0 y \u00a0le \u00a0neg\u00f3 la suspensi\u00f3n condicional de la ejecuci\u00f3n \u00a0de \u00a0 \u00a0la \u00a0 \u00a0pena, \u00a0 \u00a0al \u00a0encontrarla \u00a0 penalmente \u00a0responsable \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0de \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0los \u00a0delitos \u00a0de peculado por apropiaci\u00f3n y peculado \u00a0culposo \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 en \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0concurso.\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
2. \u00a0Recurrido \u00a0el \u00a0fallo \u00a0por la \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 defensora, el Tribunal \u00a0Superior \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 de \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Bogot\u00e1, \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0mediante \u00a0sentencia \u00a0del \u00a015 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0de \u00a0 \u00a0 marzo \u00a0 \u00a0 de \u00a0 2005, \u00a0 lo \u00a0confirm\u00f3 integralmente. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
3. \u00a0 El \u00a0 defensor \u00a0 de \u00a0 FABIOLA \u00a0GARCIA \u00a0RUIZ\u00a0 \u00a0interpuso \u00a0recurso \u00a0de \u00a0casaci\u00f3n \u00a0y, \u00a0finiquitado \u00a0el tr\u00e1mite, \u00a0mediante \u00a0sentencia del 14 \u00a0de \u00a0 \u00a0noviembre \u00a0 \u00a0de \u00a02007,\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0(radicaci\u00f3n \u00a0 \u00a0 24481, \u00a0M \u00a0.P. \u00a0Dr. Augusto \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0J. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Ib\u00e1\u00f1ez \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Guzm\u00e1n), \u00a0esta Sala de la Corte desestim\u00f3 \u00a0los \u00a0cargos \u00a0primero \u00a0y \u00a0segundo \u00a0formulados contra la \u00a0sentencia \u00a0 \u00a0recurrida \u00a0 \u00a0y \u00a0 \u00a0cas\u00f3 \u00a0 parcialmente \u00a0el \u00a0fallo \u00a0impugnado, \u00a0en \u00a0el \u00a0sentido \u00a0de \u00a0imponer \u00a0a \u00a0la procesada la pena de \u00a0treinta \u00a0y \u00a0cinco \u00a0(35) \u00a0meses \u00a0de prisi\u00f3n y la accesoria de inhabilitaci\u00f3n de \u00a0derechos y funciones p\u00fablicas, por el mismo tiempo.\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Dicha \u00a0 Sala \u00a0 de \u00a0Casaci\u00f3n \u00a0Penal \u00a0fue \u00a0integrada \u00a0 \u00a0 por \u00a0los \u00a0 magistrados \u00a0que \u00a0actualmente \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 la \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0conforman, \u00a0 a \u00a0 excepci\u00f3n \u00a0del \u00a0doctor \u00a0ALFREDO \u00a0 \u00a0 GOMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 QUINTERO.\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
4. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Posteriormente, \u00a0 \u00a0FABIOLA \u00a0 \u00a0GARCIA \u00a0RUIZ \u00a0 confiri\u00f3 \u00a0poder \u00a0especial \u00a0 al \u00a0 abogado \u00a0 Ricardo \u00a0Calvete \u00a0Rangel, \u00a0quien \u00a0en su nombre interpuso la presente acci\u00f3n de \u00a0revisi\u00f3n \u00a0 \u00a0 contra \u00a0 \u00a0 el \u00a0 \u00a0 fallo, \u00a0 \u00a0 integrado \u00a0 \u00a0por \u00a0 \u00a0las \u00a0 \u00a0sentencias \u00a0convergentes. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
5. \u00a0 De \u00a0 acuerdo \u00a0 con \u00a0 lo \u00a0estipulado \u00a0por \u00a0 \u00a0el \u00a0 \u00a0numeral \u00a06\u00b0 del art\u00edculo 99 del \u00a0C\u00f3digo \u00a0de \u00a0Procedimiento \u00a0Penal, \u00a0(Ley 600 de 2000) \u00a0constituye \u00a0 causal \u00a0 de \u00a0impedimento \u00a0el \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 que \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u201cel \u00a0funcionario \u00a0haya \u00a0dictado \u00a0la \u00a0providencia \u00a0cuya revisi\u00f3n se \u00a0trata\u201d, \u00a0hip\u00f3tesis \u00a0que se cumple en este evento, \u00a0donde \u00a0la \u00a0Sala \u00a0de \u00a0Casaci\u00f3n \u00a0Penal \u00a0de \u00a0la que form\u00e1bamos parte profiri\u00f3 la \u00a0sentencia \u00a0correspondiente al recurso extraordinario interpuesto por el defensor \u00a0de \u00a0FABIOLA GARCIAQ RUIZ; \u00a0y, \u00a0 \u00a0 precisamente, \u00a0 \u00a0 ahora, \u00a0 \u00a0 el \u00a0 \u00a0 mismo \u00a0 \u00a0implicado, por medio de su apoderado interpone \u00a0la acci\u00f3n de revisi\u00f3n. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Por \u00a0las \u00a0razones \u00a0expuestas, \u00a0el \u00a0asunto \u00a0pasar\u00e1 \u00a0 \u00a0 al \u00a0 \u00a0 despacho \u00a0 \u00a0del \u00a0 \u00a0H. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Magistrado, \u00a0 \u00a0Dr. \u00a0 \u00a0JOSE \u00a0 LEONIDAS \u00a0 BUSTOS \u00a0MARTINEZ, \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0dignatario \u00a0de \u00a0la \u00a0Sala de Casaci\u00f3n Penal que \u00a0sigue \u00a0en \u00a0turno \u00a0respecto del ponente, para los fines indicados en el art\u00edculo \u00a0103 \u00a0del \u00a0C\u00f3digo de Procedimiento Penal (Ley 600 de \u00a02000). \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0C\u00famplase \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
SIGIFREDO ESPINOSA PEREZ \u00a0<\/p>\n
MARIA \u00a0 DEL \u00a0ROSARIO \u00a0 \u00a0GONZALEZ \u00a0 \u00a0DE \u00a0 \u00a0LEMUS\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0AUGUSTO \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0IBA\u00d1EZ GUZMAN \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
JORGE \u00a0LUIS \u00a0QUINTERO \u00a0MILANES \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0YESID RAMIREZ BASTIDAS \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Permiso \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
JULIO \u00a0ENRIQUE \u00a0SOCHA SLAMANCA \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0JAVIER ZAPATA ORTIZ \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
TERESA RUIZ N\u00da\u00d1EZ \u00a0<\/p>\n
Secretaria \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u00a0 \u00a0 Proceso No 29523 \u00a0 CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA \u00a0 SALA DE CASACI\u00d3N PENAL \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16629","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-16"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16629","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16629"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16629\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16629"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16629"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16629"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}