\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Proceso No 28593 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 SALA DE CASACI\u00d3N PENAL \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 MAGISTRADO \u00a0PONENTE \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 AUGUSTO \u00a0 \u00a0 J. \u00a0 \u00a0 IB\u00c1\u00d1EZ \u00a0GUZM\u00c1N \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Aprobado \u00a0Acta No.105 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Bogot\u00e1, \u00a0D.C., treinta (30) de abril de dos \u00a0mil ocho (2008). \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
ASUNTO \u00a0<\/p>\n
La \u00a0Sala \u00a0se pronuncia sobre la solicitud de \u00a0pruebas \u00a0que \u00a0hace el defensor del ciudadano colombiano \u00a0Diego \u00a0 \u00a0Edilson \u00a0 Giraldo \u00a0 Alzate, \u00a0 requerido \u00a0 en \u00a0extradici\u00f3n \u00a0por el Gobierno de Estados Unidos de Am\u00e9rica, para que comparezca \u00a0a juicio por \u201cdelitos federales de narc\u00f3ticos\u201d. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
LA SOLICITUD \u00a0<\/p>\n
Pide \u00a0que \u00a0se \u00a0admitan varios documentos que \u00a0demuestran \u00a0en \u00a0primer lugar, la actividad\u00a0 profesional u oficio del se\u00f1or \u00a0Giraldo \u00a0 Alzate, \u00a0 entre\u00a0 \u00a0 ellos, \u00a0 una\u00a0 \u00a0certificaci\u00f3n\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0de \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
C\u00e1mara de Comercio del Oriente Antioque\u00f1o. \u00a0En \u00a0 segundo \u00a0 lugar, \u00a0 otras \u00a0certificaciones \u00a0en \u00a0las \u00a0que \u00a0se \u00a0establece \u00a0que \u00a0Giraldo \u00a0Alzate \u00a0no \u00a0ha sido \u00a0empleado \u00a0de \u00a0los \u00a0Aeropuertos Olaya Herrera de Medell\u00edn y Jos\u00e9 Maria C\u00f3rdoba \u00a0del \u00a0municipio \u00a0de \u00a0Rionegro, \u00a0y \u00a0por \u00a0\u00faltimo, \u00a0certificaci\u00f3n \u00a0expedida por la \u00a0Aeron\u00e1utica \u00a0Civil\u00a0 \u00a0Regional \u00a0de Antioquia, en la que se indica, la fecha \u00a0hasta \u00a0 \u00a0 la \u00a0 \u00a0 cual\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0el \u00a0 \u00a0aeropuerto \u00a0 \u00a0Olaya \u00a0 \u00a0Herrera\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0fue \u00a0internacional. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Lo anterior, con el fin de establecer que no \u00a0se acredita con la plena identidad del requerido. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0CONSIDERACIONES \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
La \u00a0 Corte \u00a0 inadmitir\u00e1 \u00a0 los \u00a0documentos \u00a0aportados, por las siguientes razones: \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
1. Las condiciones laborales y econ\u00f3micas de \u00a0la \u00a0persona \u00a0solicitada \u00a0en \u00a0extradici\u00f3n no\u00a0 inciden en el tr\u00e1mite que se \u00a0adelanta \u00a0ante \u00a0la \u00a0Sala \u00a0de \u00a0Casaci\u00f3n Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de \u00a0nuestro \u00a0pa\u00eds, \u00a0porque, \u00a0es \u00a0un asunto que legalmente no le compete1. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
2. \u00a0El \u00a0C\u00f3digo de Procedimiento Penal s\u00f3lo \u00a0exige, \u00a0previo \u00a0a esta intervenci\u00f3n, que el Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores \u00a0haya \u00a0establecido cu\u00e1l es el ordenamiento jur\u00eddico que debe regular la demanda \u00a0de \u00a0extradici\u00f3n \u00a0y \u00a0que su hom\u00f3logo de Justicia y del Derecho haya obtenido el \u00a0perfeccionamiento \u00a0del \u00a0expediente, \u00a0presupuestos \u00a0cumplidos \u00a0cabalmente en este \u00a0asunto por parte de la Administraci\u00f3n. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Si \u00a0la \u00a0extradici\u00f3n \u00a0es \u00a0viable, \u00a0una \u00a0vez \u00a0otorgada, \u00a0 \u00a0todo \u00a0 \u00a0lo \u00a0 \u00a0dem\u00e1s \u00a0 le \u00a0 corresponde \u00a0 al \u00a0 \u201cjuez \u00a0 natural\u201d \u00a0extranjero. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
3.Por lo tanto, las pruebas que se soliciten \u00a0deben \u00a0ce\u00f1irse \u00a0al \u00a0objeto \u00a0del \u00a0tr\u00e1mite \u00a0que \u00a0se surte en el seno de la Corte \u00a0Suprema \u00a0de \u00a0Justicia, \u00a0es decir, a desvirtuar el cumplimiento de los requisitos \u00a0consagrados \u00a0 en \u00a0 la \u00a0legislaci\u00f3n \u00a0procesal \u00a0penal \u00a0interna, \u00a0que \u00a0le \u00a0compete \u00a0verificar. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
4. \u00a0Como \u00a0la \u00a0Sala estima que los documentos \u00a0aportados \u00a0al tr\u00e1mite son suficientes para rendir su concepto, no decretar\u00e1 la \u00a0pr\u00e1ctica \u00a0oficiosa de pruebas y dispondr\u00e1 el traslado para la presentaci\u00f3n de \u00a0los estudios de los intervinientes. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Consecuente \u00a0con \u00a0lo \u00a0expuesto, \u00a0la \u00a0Sala de \u00a0Casaci\u00f3n Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0RESUELVE \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
1. \u00a0Inadmitir \u00a0las \u00a0pruebas\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0aportadas \u00a0 \u00a0por \u00a0 \u00a0el \u00a0 defensor \u00a0 del \u00a0 se\u00f1or \u00a0 Diego Edilson Giraldo Alzate. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
2. \u00a0 No \u00a0ordenar \u00a0pruebas de oficio. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
3. \u00a0Disponer el traslado previsto en el inciso \u00a0final \u00a0del \u00a0art\u00edculo \u00a0500 \u00a0del \u00a0C\u00f3digo \u00a0de \u00a0Procedimiento \u00a0Penal, para que los \u00a0intervinientes presenten sus estudios previos al concepto de fondo. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Contra \u00a0esta decisi\u00f3n procede el recurso de \u00a0reposici\u00f3n. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Notif\u00edquese y c\u00famplase. \u00a0<\/p>\n
SIGIFREDO ESPINOSA P\u00c9REZ \u00a0<\/p>\n
JOS\u00c9 \u00a0LEONIDAS \u00a0BUSTOS \u00a0MART\u00cdNEZ \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0ALFREDO G\u00d3MEZ \u00a0QUINTERO \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
MAR\u00cdA \u00a0DEL \u00a0ROSARIO \u00a0GONZ\u00c1LEZ \u00a0DE \u00a0LEMOS\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0AUGUSTO J. IB\u00c1\u00d1EZ GUZM\u00c1N \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
JORGE \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 LUIS \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 QUINTERO \u00a0MILAN\u00c9S\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 YESID \u00a0RAM\u00cdREZ \u00a0BASTIDAS\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Permiso \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
JULIO \u00a0ENRIQUE \u00a0SOCHA \u00a0SALAMANCA\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 JAVIER ZAPATA ORTIZ \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
TERESA RUIZ N\u00da\u00d1EZ \u00a0<\/p>\n
Secretaria \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
1 \u00a0Auto \u00a0del \u00a013 \u00a0de diciembre del 2001, radicaci\u00f3n No. \u00a016722. \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Proceso No 28593 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15832","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-16"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15832","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15832"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15832\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15832"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15832"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15832"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}