\u00a0 \u00a0 PROCESO No. 14357 \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0SALA DE CASACION PENAL \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 Magistrado Ponente: \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 DR.DIDIMO PAEZ VELANDIA \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 Aprobado \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Acta \u00a0 \u00a0 N\ufffd135 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Santaf\u00e9 de Bogot\u00e1, \u00a0D.C., septiembre ocho (8) de mil novecientos noventa y ocho (1998). \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Se \u00a0desata \u00a0el \u00a0recurso \u00a0 de \u00a0reposici\u00f3n \u00a0interpuesto \u00a0por \u00a0el procesado, abogado MANUEL ANTONIO \u00a0IGLESIAS \u00a0MARTINEZ, contra el auto proferido por esta \u00a0Sala \u00a0el \u00a015 \u00a0de \u00a0julio \u00a0del \u00a0a\u00f1o que transcurre, mediante el cual se resolvi\u00f3 \u00a0negativamente \u00a0la \u00a0solicitud de concesi\u00f3n del recurso de casaci\u00f3n excepcional, \u00a0basada \u00a0en \u00a0el tercer inciso del art\u00edculo 218 del C. de P.P., presentada por el \u00a0mismo profesional. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 ANTECEDENTES \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Por\u00a0 \u00a0abstenerse\u00a0 \u00a0 el\u00a0 \u00a0 recurrente\u00a0 \u00a0 de \u00a0 establecer \u00a0 la \u00a0necesaria \u00a0correlaci\u00f3n \u00a0entre \u00a0su \u00a0petici\u00f3n \u00a0de \u00a0concesi\u00f3n \u00a0del \u00a0recurso \u00a0extraordinario \u00a0excepcional \u00a0a \u00a0trav\u00e9s \u00a0del \u00a0cual \u00a0pretend\u00eda \u00a0impugnar la sentencia de segunda \u00a0instancia \u00a0dictada \u00a0el \u00a031 \u00a0de \u00a0octubre \u00a0de \u00a01997 \u00a0por \u00a0el Juzgado 4\ufffd \u00a0Penal \u00a0del \u00a0Circuito \u00a0de \u00a0Santaf\u00e9 de \u00a0Bogot\u00e1 \u00a0y \u00a0los motivos autorizados en el tercer inciso del art\u00edculo 218 del C. \u00a0de \u00a0P.P. \u00a0para que la Corte dentro de su competencia determinara si conced\u00eda la \u00a0impugnaci\u00f3n, \u00a0 se \u00a0 resolvi\u00f3 \u00a0 adversamente \u00a0 su \u00a0pretensi\u00f3n, \u00a0en \u00a0la \u00a0citada \u00a0providencia \u00a0del \u00a0quince \u00a0(15) \u00a0de julio pr\u00f3ximo pasado, que ahora cuestiona el \u00a0mismo \u00a0interesado \u00a0a \u00a0trav\u00e9s \u00a0del \u00a0recurso \u00a0de reposici\u00f3n, arguyendo que en el \u00a0proceso \u00a0de \u00a0cuyo fallo disiente, hubo por parte de los funcionarios judiciales, \u00a0tanto \u00a0de \u00a0la fase instructiva como de la del plenario, transgresi\u00f3n de, seg\u00fan \u00a0precisa: \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0“los \u00a0par\u00e1metros \u00a0inmersos \u00a0en \u00a0el \u00a0Art.29 \u00a0de \u00a0Nuestra \u00a0Carta Magna… por cuanto se \u00a0abri\u00f3 \u00a0la \u00a0correspondiente investigaci\u00f3n con elementos de juicio completamente \u00a0diversos \u00a0a \u00a0los \u00a0que \u00a0en \u00a0aras de la verdad y la buena fe, erig\u00edan culto a una \u00a0realidad, taxitamente (sic) planteada”. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Solicitando, \u00a0luego \u00a0de algunas \u00a0expresiones \u00a0complementarias \u00a0de lo anotado, la reconsideraci\u00f3n de la decisi\u00f3n \u00a0que \u00a0 impugna \u00a0 “en \u00a0 aras \u00a0 de \u00a0 una \u00a0 recta \u00a0 y \u00a0 eficaz \u00a0 administraci\u00f3n \u00a0de \u00a0justicia”. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0CONSIDERACIONES \u00a0 DE \u00a0 LA \u00a0CORTE \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Olvida \u00a0 el \u00a0se\u00f1or \u00a0abogado \u00a0sentenciado \u00a0y \u00a0recurrente, \u00a0que en el r\u00e9gimen legal vigente en nuestro sistema \u00a0jur\u00eddico \u00a0impera \u00a0para \u00a0los \u00a0sujetos \u00a0procesales el principio de preclusividad, \u00a0seg\u00fan \u00a0el \u00a0cual, \u00a0el proceso se desarrolla en una secuencia de actos procesales \u00a0que \u00a0deben \u00a0ejecutarse dentro del plazo precisamente se\u00f1alado para ellos, y que \u00a0por \u00a0consiguiente, \u00a0al \u00a0expirar \u00a0el \u00a0t\u00e9rmino \u00a0contemplado \u00a0para \u00a0la espec\u00edfica \u00a0actividad \u00a0de \u00a0dichos \u00a0sujetos, \u00a0no puede ya realizarse porque su oportunidad ha \u00a0preclu\u00eddo. \u00a0Vale \u00a0decir, \u00a0la \u00a0preclusi\u00f3n traduce la clausura de un determinado \u00a0tracto \u00a0procesal \u00a0y \u00a0cierra \u00a0la posibilidad de ejercer un determinado derecho, y \u00a0tambi\u00e9n \u00a0la de cumplir una espec\u00edfica carga procesal que debi\u00f3 colmarse en un \u00a0lapso preestablecido. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Para el caso que se examina, la \u00a0oportunidad \u00a0que \u00a0ten\u00eda \u00a0el \u00a0recurrente \u00a0de adecuar a la previsi\u00f3n legal de la \u00a0norma \u00a0 de \u00a0 soporte \u00a0 de \u00a0 la \u00a0 petici\u00f3n \u00a0 el \u00a0o \u00a0los \u00a0motivos \u00a0para \u00a0impugnar \u00a0extraordinariamente \u00a0y \u00a0de \u00a0manera \u00a0excepcional \u00a0el \u00a0fallo \u00a0de segundo grado, se \u00a0agot\u00f3 \u00a0con \u00a0el \u00a0t\u00e9rmino \u00a0legal \u00a0para \u00a0interponer \u00a0el recurso extraordinario, y \u00a0aunque \u00a0de \u00a0ella \u00a0hizo \u00a0uso \u00a0el profesional lo fue deficientemente, en cuanto no \u00a0expuso \u00a0 las \u00a0 precisiones \u00a0 indispensables \u00a0para \u00a0el \u00a0empe\u00f1o \u00a0de \u00a0ese \u00a0momento \u00a0procesal. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Si \u00a0como \u00a0consecuencia \u00a0de \u00a0esa \u00a0falencia \u00a0se \u00a0deneg\u00f3 \u00a0su petici\u00f3n, no puede ahora habilitar el t\u00e9rmino que le \u00a0otorga \u00a0el recurso de reposici\u00f3n para enmendar su yerro, ni la Corte aceptarlo, \u00a0porque \u00a0ello ser\u00eda crear un dispositivo procesal no previsto por el legislador, \u00a0quebrant\u00e1ndose \u00a0as\u00ed \u00a0la \u00a0garant\u00eda \u00a0del debido proceso, uno de los pilares del \u00a0orden jur\u00eddico interno. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0De tal manera, se desestimar\u00e1 la \u00a0argumentaci\u00f3n \u00a0que \u00a0a \u00a0posteriori \u00a0pretende \u00a0hacer \u00a0valer \u00a0el \u00a0recurrente, y se \u00a0denegar\u00e1 la reposici\u00f3n solicitada. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Por \u00a0raz\u00f3n de lo expuesto, la \u00a0CORTE \u00a0SUPREMA \u00a0DE \u00a0JUSTICIA \u00a0en \u00a0SALA \u00a0DE \u00a0CASACION \u00a0PENAL, \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0R E S U E L V E : \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0NO \u00a0 REPONER \u00a0 \u00a0el \u00a0 \u00a0auto \u00a0 \u00a0recurrido.\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0En \u00a0 \u00a0firme, \u00a0 \u00a0DEVUELVASE \u00a0el \u00a0expediente al Tribunal \u00a0de origen. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0C\u00f3piese, \u00a0 Notif\u00edquese \u00a0y \u00a0C\u00famplase. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0JORGE \u00a0 ENRIQUE \u00a0 CORDOBA \u00a0POVEDA \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
FERNANDO \u00a0 E.ARBOLEDA \u00a0RIPOLL \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0RICARDO \u00a0 \u00a0 CALVETE \u00a0RANGEL \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
CARLOS \u00a0 A. \u00a0 GALVEZ \u00a0 ARGOTE \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 JORGE A.GOMEZ \u00a0GALLEGO \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
EDGAR \u00a0 \u00a0LOMBANA \u00a0 TRUJILLO \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0CARLOS E.MEJIA ESCOBAR \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
DIDIMO \u00a0 \u00a0PAEZ \u00a0 \u00a0VELANDIA \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0NILSON PINILLA PINILLA \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0PATRICIA SALAZAR CUELLAR \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Secretaria \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u00a0 \u00a0 PROCESO No. 14357 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0SALA DE CASACION PENAL \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 Magistrado Ponente: \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1297","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-6"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1297","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1297"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1297\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1297"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1297"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1297"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}