\u00a0 \u00a0 Proceso No 25054 \u00a0<\/p>\n
CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA \u00a0<\/p>\n
SALA DE CASACI\u00d3N PENAL \u00a0<\/p>\n
MAGISTRADO PONENTE \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00c1LVARO ORLANDO P\u00c9REZ PINZ\u00d3N \u00a0<\/p>\n
Aprobado: Acta No.010 \u00a0<\/p>\n
Bogot\u00e1, D. C., primero (1) de febrero de dos \u00a0mil siete (2007). \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
MOTIVO DE LA DECISI\u00d3N \u00a0<\/p>\n
La \u00a0Sala \u00a0se \u00a0pronuncia sobre el impedimento \u00a0que, \u00a0para \u00a0integrar la Sala que debe resolver la acci\u00f3n de revisi\u00f3n propuesta \u00a0por \u00a0la \u00a0apoderada \u00a0de \u00a0la \u00a0doctora \u00a0Amparo Rodr\u00edguez \u00a0Rold\u00e1n, \u00a0hacen \u00a0manifiesto \u00a0los magistrados, doctores \u00a0Sigifredo \u00a0 Espinosa \u00a0P\u00e9rez, \u00a0Alfredo \u00a0G\u00f3mez \u00a0Quintero, \u00a0Jorge \u00a0Luis \u00a0Quintero \u00a0Milan\u00e9s, Yesid Ram\u00edrez Bastidas y Javier Zapata Ortiz. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
ANTECEDENTES Y CONSIDERACIONES \u00a0<\/p>\n
1. \u00a0Mediante sentencia del 27 de octubre del \u00a02005, \u00a0la \u00a0Sala \u00a0de \u00a0Casaci\u00f3n Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, en sede de \u00a0segunda \u00a0 instancia, \u00a0 confirm\u00f3, \u00a0 con \u00a0 modificaciones, \u00a0la \u00a0del \u00a0A \u00a0 quo, \u00a0 que \u00a0 conden\u00f3 \u00a0a \u00a0la \u00a0doctora \u00a0Amparo Rodr\u00edguez Rold\u00e1n, ex \u00a0Juez \u00a031 \u00a0Penal \u00a0Municipal \u00a0de \u00a0Cali, \u00a0como autora del delito de prevaricato por \u00a0acci\u00f3n (radicado 18.788). \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
2. \u00a0A \u00a0trav\u00e9s \u00a0de \u00a0apoderada, \u00a0la \u00a0doctora \u00a0Rodr\u00edguez \u00a0Rold\u00e1n present\u00f3 \u00a0demanda mediante la cual solicita la revisi\u00f3n de los fallos. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
3. \u00a0En \u00a0auto \u00a0del \u00a0pasado 31 de octubre, los \u00a0se\u00f1ores \u00a0magistrados \u00a0arriba se\u00f1alados se declararon impedidos para decidir la \u00a0acci\u00f3n \u00a0de \u00a0revisi\u00f3n, \u00a0de \u00a0conformidad \u00a0con \u00a0el \u00a0art\u00edculo \u00a0228 del C\u00f3digo de \u00a0Procedimiento \u00a0 Penal, \u00a0 raz\u00f3n \u00a0 por \u00a0 la \u00a0 cual \u00a0se \u00a0procedi\u00f3 \u00a0al \u00a0sorteo \u00a0de \u00a0conjueces. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Incontrastable resulta la estructuraci\u00f3n de \u00a0la \u00a0causal \u00a0especial invocada, prevista en esa disposici\u00f3n, en armon\u00eda con los \u00a0art\u00edculos \u00a099.6 \u00a0y \u00a0siguientes \u00a0del mismo Estatuto, por cuanto los funcionarios \u00a0suscribieron la providencia cuyo examen se demanda. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Consecuente \u00a0con \u00a0lo \u00a0expuesto, \u00a0la \u00a0Sala de \u00a0Casaci\u00f3n Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
RESUELVE \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
Declarar \u00a0fundado el impedimento \u00a0para \u00a0tramitar y decidir la acci\u00f3n de revisi\u00f3n presentada por la \u00a0apoderada \u00a0 \u00a0de \u00a0 \u00a0la \u00a0 doctora \u00a0 Amparo \u00a0 Rodr\u00edguez \u00a0Rold\u00e1n, \u00a0 manifestado \u00a0por \u00a0los \u00a0doctores \u00a0Sigifredo \u00a0Espinosa \u00a0P\u00e9rez, \u00a0Alfredo \u00a0G\u00f3mez Quintero, Jorge Luis Quintero Milan\u00e9s, Yesid \u00a0Ram\u00edrez Bastidas y Javier Zapata Ortiz. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
En consecuencia, los mismos no integrar\u00e1n la \u00a0Sala de Decisi\u00f3n. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Notif\u00edquese y c\u00famplase. \u00a0<\/p>\n
MAURO \u00a0 \u00a0SOLARTE \u00a0PORTILLA \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
LUIS \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 BERNARDO \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 ALZATE \u00a0G\u00d3MEZ\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0GUILLERMO \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 ANGULO \u00a0GONZ\u00c1LEZ \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Conjuez \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Conjuez \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
MIGUEL \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 C\u00d3RDOBA \u00a0ANGULO\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00c1LVARO ORLANDO P\u00c9REZ PINZ\u00d3N \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Conjuez \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
MARINA \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0PULIDO \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0DE \u00a0BAR\u00d3N\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0JULIO \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0ENRIQUE \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 SOCHA \u00a0SALAMANCA\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
EDUARDO \u00a0 \u00a0TORRES \u00a0ESCALL\u00d3N\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0LUIS ARNOLDO ZARAZO OVIEDO \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Conjuez \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Conjuez \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
TERESA RUIZ N\u00da\u00d1EZ \u00a0<\/p>\n
Secretaria \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u00a0 \u00a0 Proceso No 25054 \u00a0 CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA \u00a0 SALA DE CASACI\u00d3N PENAL \u00a0 MAGISTRADO PONENTE \u00a0 \u00c1LVARO ORLANDO P\u00c9REZ PINZ\u00d3N \u00a0 Aprobado: Acta No.010 \u00a0 Bogot\u00e1, D. C., primero (1) de febrero de dos \u00a0mil siete (2007). \u00a0\u00a0 MOTIVO DE LA DECISI\u00d3N \u00a0 La \u00a0Sala \u00a0se \u00a0pronuncia sobre el impedimento \u00a0que, \u00a0para […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12810","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-15"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12810","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12810"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12810\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12810"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12810"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salapenalcronologico20230723\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12810"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}